Volume 1 Issue 2.0    March 26, 1998 (C) John Reed

The mainstream standard homogenous accretion model for planet formation is supported, in part, by the idea of a metallic and ferrite iron core at the center of the Earth. The justification for this theoretical composition is in the fact that the two forms of iron combined will take up less space. The consideration for space takes precedence over some otherwise logical indicators. For example, it is known that the ferrous form of iron is more prevalent, and that these two types of iron are incompatible. The economic treatment of space will be taken a great deal further in the randa major development.

Frequency and wavelength are properties attendant to stable atomic cyclic systems. The planet period and swept out area per unit time are solar system analogs. All four quantities figure in the economic and boundary conditions of stable systems. Absent the focusing points of view we have tentatively set aside, and if it is our intent to advance mankind's knowledge, we must seriously entertain the idea that the Sun, at one time, if not now, exercised direct control over the orbits of the planets. The planet speeds up and slows down while the angular velocity or swept out area remains invariant.

Energy is tied to frequency and wavelength as measurable emission processes of the atom. These properties will be maintained by the randa major.

According to the one postulate for the randa minor and major, the quantities known as angular momentum and centripetal acceleration are the direct consequence of the principle of least action. The principle of least action is further reduced to the economic conic order of form when plotted as a function of 3D time and/or space. A comparison of the two and their derivatives also yield results that derive from the economic orders of form. An interest arises regarding the viability of several of these quantities in a direct comparative sense.

According to Einstein and others before him, for every atom with inertial force [ma], exists an atom with a rest energy of [mc²]. Here [a] represents acceleration, [m] represents mass, and [c] is the velocity of EMR. Since [a] (or v/t), cannot exceed [c] as [v] by postulate, then [a] cannot exceed a velocity [c]. Acceleration stops at [c] so we have [mc] as a limit on gravitational acceleration. Energy on the other hand, is always [mc²]. Since these quantities each derive from the economic symmetric, the comparative ratio is [c/c²] . This ratio may reflect a property that applies to the conservation of energy. In short, due to the equivalence equation [E=mc²] and the significant restriction on the magnitude of force as [ma], it is reasonable to conclude that the energy of matter [mc²] will maintain a state of integrity sufficient to handle the weight [ma] of matter.

Given the critical dimensions that are thought to result in a black hole, I will argue that the rest energy of each stable atom will do more than passively bounce around rapidly within its container until the temperature from the bouncing becomes so intense that it causes a theoretical fusion of hydrogen into helium, helium into carbon, carbon into iron, under successive magnitudes of severe pressure, to ultimately result in a black hole. Rather than a controlling universally additive force of gravity, I will introduce the randa major as the logical consequence of the randa minor and the principle of least action.